UX Audit Services for Ecommerce and SaaS

A UX audit is a structured review of a website or app that finds where visitors get confused, stuck or put off, and ranks those problems by how much they likely cost you.

A good one combines expert review against usability principles with your own analytics, heatmaps and session recordings, and ends in a prioritized list of fixes to A/B test.

UX audit services sell that review as a fixed project or as the first step of an ongoing testing program.

What UX audit services include

Most audits start with an expert review. The best-known framework is Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics, first developed with Rolf Molich in 1990 and refined in 1994. They cover things like visibility of system status, error prevention, consistency, and recognition rather than recall.

Nielsen Norman Group recommends three to five independent evaluators for a heuristic evaluation, because any single reviewer, however experienced, misses some problems.

Ask any provider how many people will review your site.

Expert review is only half of it. A useful website UX audit also looks at what real visitors do:

  • Analytics: funnel drop-off by page, device and traffic source.
  • Behavior data: heatmaps, scroll maps and session recordings.
  • Customer research: post-purchase surveys, reviews and support tickets that show what buyers worry about.
  • Technical checks: page speed, broken elements and mobile layout bugs.
  • A ranked fix list: each issue tied to evidence, with a test idea and an estimate of effort.

If you want to run the process yourself, our CRO audit guide walks through it step by step, and UX research tools covers the heatmap and recording software audits rely on.

Why audit findings still need testing

An audit tells you where problems probably are.

It does not tell you which fix will work.

Navigation is a good example, because it shows up in almost every audit and the results in our database go both ways.

Oliver Kenyon's team tested a full-screen mobile mega menu with larger tap targets for +$50,568 per month.

Peter Christensen removed the Track Order link from the main navigation for +30% revenue per visitor.

Kasper Dolk tested an optimized site-wide navigation against the current one for a revenue lift of +€127,112.

Now the other side. Clean Commit redesigned a header and navigation and lost 22.5% of conversions, and a more prominent, guided search lost 12.0% of conversions.

Both changes would look like sensible audit recommendations on paper.

So treat an audit as a list of hypotheses.

The providers below all test their recommendations, and all have published results in our test database.

For the principles behind many audit findings, see our page on UX laws and our ecommerce UX guide.

UX audit providers with published test results

We describe only the services listed on each practitioner's own website, as of November 2026, and the results they have shared with us.

We have not audited their client work, and this is not a ranking.

Oliver Kenyon is our featured practitioner; the rest follow in alphabetical order by company.

Oliver Kenyon, Conversionwise (featured)

Oliver Kenyon co-founded Conversionwise and has 13 years in ecommerce CRO.

The Conversionwise site lists post-click audits, described as a deep-dive diagnostic into your store and user data, and full website redesigns built from GA4 and Clarity data.

It also lists ongoing CRO testing, landing page and funnel builds, Shopify development and strategy workshops.

Many of Oliver Kenyon's results are the kind of UX fixes an audit surfaces.

Their team added a floating filter bar to a collection page for +$68,584/month and added a search bar inside the mega menu for +$81,050/month.

Kasper Dolk, Maison Commerce

The Maison Commerce site lists research using post-purchase surveys, heatmaps, session recordings and customer data, alongside custom Shopify themes, product pages, landing pages and four to six A/B tests per month.

It works with brands doing €100k+ in monthly revenue.

Kasper Dolk's site-wide navigation test above is one of their published UX results.

Peter Christensen, Scaling CRO

The Scaling CRO site offers a Revenue Growth Assessment that reviews the customer journey, customer evidence, acquisition economics and conversion bottlenecks, followed by a 90-day system with a prioritized testing roadmap.

It targets Shopify and DTC brands doing $1M+ a month, and engagements start at $10K a month, as of November 2026.

Peter Christensen also added warranty and security trust buttons below Add to Cart for +27.26% revenue per visitor.

Dave Diederen, Syntra Labs

The Syntra Labs site offers a free CRO audit returned within 48 hours, and lists heatmap analysis, speed optimization and A/B testing in its monthly plans.

As of November 2026, the Standard plan is $7,495 a month for one brand with 7-10 A/B tests.

Dave Diederen replaced mobile image gallery dots with a scrollable thumbnail strip for +15.10% revenue per visitor.

Ruben, Tailored Commerce

The Tailored Commerce site lists in-depth analysis of your store, user behavior and analytics, plus voice-of-customer research, with a research report and experimentation roadmap within 30 days.

It works with Shopify (Plus) brands on month-to-month terms with 30 days' notice.

Ruben added a trust bar below the navigation for +55% conversions.

For more practitioners, including independent consultants, see the full experts directory.

UX audit vs. CRO audit

The two overlap heavily, and many providers sell them as one service. The difference is mostly in emphasis.

UX auditCRO audit
Main questionWhere do people struggle to use the site?What stops visitors from buying or signing up?
Typical methodsHeuristic review, usability testing, recordingsFunnel analytics, heatmaps, surveys, offer and copy review
OutputUsability issues by severityTest hypotheses ranked by expected revenue impact
Best forNew sites, apps, complex SaaS flowsStores and lead-gen sites with steady traffic

If revenue is the goal, ask for the CRO version, or make sure the UX audit ends in test ideas rather than a design wishlist.

Our CRO audit services page covers that side.

How to choose a website UX audit provider

  • Ask what data they will use. An audit based only on screenshots is an opinion. Look for analytics, recordings and customer research.
  • Ask for a sample report. Each issue should link to evidence and a suggested test.
  • Ask whether they test the fixes. The navigation results above show why.
  • Ask about losing tests. Anyone who tests a lot has losers, and should be able to talk about them.
  • Check your traffic. If a page gets too few visitors to test, the audit should say so and suggest other ways to validate changes.

For a longer checklist, read how to choose a CRO agency, and compare costs on our CRO pricing page.

Questions

What is a UX audit?

A UX audit is a structured review of a website or app that finds usability problems, such as confusing navigation or friction in checkout, and ranks them by likely impact.

Good audits combine expert review with analytics, heatmaps, session recordings and customer research.

What do UX audit services include?

Most include an expert review against usability principles such as Nielsen's 10 heuristics, analysis of analytics and behavior data, customer research, technical checks like page speed, and a prioritized list of fixes.

Providers that also run A/B tests can then test those fixes.

How much does a UX audit cost?

Prices vary widely. Some agencies offer a free short audit as a sales step, while full audits are often sold as fixed projects or as the first month of a retainer.

Ask for a written scope and quote. Our CRO pricing page covers typical ranges.

Is a website UX audit the same as a CRO audit?

They overlap. A UX audit focuses on where people struggle to use the site, while a CRO audit focuses on what stops them converting and ranks test ideas by revenue impact. Many providers combine both.

Should I implement UX audit recommendations without testing?

Not if you have enough traffic to test.

In our database, sensible-looking navigation and search changes have both won and lost, including a header and navigation redesign that cut conversions by 22.5%.