Modern product image carousel: +4.5% add-to-cart, sales flat

Flat / inconclusiveProduct page

A taller product image area with minimal arrows, dot indicators and swipe support lifted add-to-cart rate 4.5%, but conversion rate rose only 1.1% and revenue per visitor fell 1.1%.

Clean Commit ran this test across 84,028 visitors for an anonymized Shopify store and published it in its A/B test library.

The extra adds didn't turn into more sales, so we count it as inconclusive.

+4.5% add-to-cart, sales flat
  • Add-to-cart rate: +4.5%, with a 99.1% probability of beating the original. This was the target metric and a clear lift.
  • Conversion rate: +1.1%, within normal variation. Flat.
  • Revenue per visitor: -1.1%, with orders up only 1.0% and average order value down 2.6%.
  • Devices split: desktop conversion rate rose 5.2%, while mobile average order value fell 4.5%.

The change

Control (A)
header
title
price
variant picker
Add to cart
description
reviews
Variant (B)
header
title
price
variant picker
Add to cart
description
reviews

The variant enlarges the gallery and modernizes its controls.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

The product page used the store's original image carousel and controls.

Variant

The image area was taller, the carousel used minimal arrows and dot indicators, and shoppers could swipe between images.

Why it likely came out this way

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • Bigger, easier-to-browse images make the product more appealing, which shows up as more adds to cart.
  • Adding to cart is a low-commitment step. Price, shipping and checkout still decide whether the order happens.
  • A taller image area pushes price and details further down, which may matter more on mobile.

Caveats: The target metric rose clearly, but orders, conversion rate and revenue per visitor did not, so the business result is flat. Test duration was not shared.

Who ran it

Clean Commit ran this test for a Shopify store (anonymized) and published the results (Clean Commit A/B test library). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original case study on Clean Commit →

How to run this test on your store

Hypothesis
If we make product images larger and easier to swipe through, then more shoppers will buy because they can judge the product better.
Primary metric
Conversion rate
Guardrails
  • Add-to-cart rate
  • Revenue per visitor
  • Mobile average order value
Who should test it
Stores where the look of the product drives the sale, such as fashion, furniture or decor, and whose current gallery is small or awkward on mobile. Pick orders or revenue as the main metric, not add-to-cart.

Questions

Do bigger product images increase sales?

In this test they lifted add-to-cart 4.5%, but orders rose only 1.0%.

Bigger images may draw interest without closing more sales.

Is add-to-cart rate a good primary metric?

It is useful as a signal, but it can rise while sales stay flat, as here.

Use conversion rate or revenue per visitor to decide.

Should product image carousels support swipe on mobile?

Swipe is what most phone users expect. This test bundled it with other gallery changes, so its own effect is unknown.

Similar tests