Size-based 'Only X left!' stock message: about +$899K a month

WinnerProduct page

Tuckernuck added a low-stock message on product pages that shows how many units are left in the selected size, with an estimated revenue uplift of about $899K a month.

Domaine ran this test for the women's fashion brand Tuckernuck and built it in Visually, which published it as a case study.

The monthly figure is an estimate, and sample size and significance were not shared.

about +$899K a month
  • Revenue: about +$899K estimated monthly uplift.
  • The figure is a projection, not measured revenue, and no conversion rate change was shared.
  • Sample size, test length and confidence were not reported.

The change

Control (A)
header
title
price
Size selector
Add to cart
description
reviews
Variant (B)
header
title
price
Size selector
Only X left! (selected size)NEW
Add to cart
description
reviews

A low-stock count for the selected size appears under the size picker.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

Product pages showed no stock message when a shopper picked a size.

Variant

When a shopper selected a size, a dynamic "Only X left!" message showed the stock count for that size.

Why it likely won

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • Showing stock for the chosen size makes the scarcity specific and believable, not a generic sitewide badge.
  • Fashion shoppers know popular sizes sell out, so a low count prompts them to buy now rather than wait.
  • The message appears right when the shopper commits to a size, close to the add-to-cart decision.

Caveats: The monthly uplift is an estimate. Vendor-reported in a Visually case study; sample size, test length and significance were not shared.

Who ran it

Domaine ran this test for Tuckernuck and published the results (Visually case study). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original case study on Domaine →

How to run this test on your store

Hypothesis
If we show a real stock count for the selected size when it runs low, then more shoppers will buy now because they see that their size may sell out.
Primary metric
Revenue per visitor
Guardrails
  • Conversion rate
  • Return rate
  • Add-to-cart rate for sizes with high stock
Who should test it
Apparel and footwear stores with limited stock per size and fast-moving drops. Only show true counts; fake scarcity can damage trust, and it won't help stores with deep, steady inventory.

Questions

Do low-stock messages increase sales?

They often do when the stock is real.

Tuckernuck's size-based message was estimated to add about $899K a month.

Should stock counts be per size or per product?

Per size is more useful in apparel, because a product can be in stock overall while the shopper's size is nearly gone.

At what stock level should I show the message?

The case study did not share a threshold.

Many stores show it only below a small number, so the message stays rare and credible.

Similar tests