Discount badge and weekly-equivalent price: +50% conversion

WinnerPaywall · 2024-09

Adding a discount percentage and a weekly-equivalent price to the yearly plan lifted paywall conversion by 50% and proceeds per user by 62.5%.

Stardust, a cycle and pregnancy tracking app, ran this test, written up on the Superwall blog.

Prices stayed at $24.99 per year and $2.99 per week.

+50% conversion; +62.5% proceeds per user; yearly share +30%
  • Paywall conversion: +50%.
  • Proceeds per user: +62.5%, driven by more users choosing the yearly plan.
  • Yearly share: new yearly subscriptions rose 30% as a share of sales.
  • Two other variants (yearly-first with a 'More Pricing' drawer, and yearly only) lost on both conversion and proceeds per user.

The change

Control (A)
close
title
benefits
Yearly $24.99REPLACED
Weekly $2.99
Shop now
Variant (B)
close
title
benefits
Discount percentageNEW
Yearly $24.99, weekly equivalentNEW
Weekly $2.99
Shop now

Same prices; the yearly plan gains a discount badge and a weekly-equivalent price.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

A yearly plan at $24.99 and a weekly plan at $2.99, each shown with just price and duration.

Variant

The same prices, with a discount percentage on the yearly plan and its price also shown as a weekly equivalent.

Why it likely won

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • A weekly equivalent lets users compare the yearly plan directly with the $2.99 weekly plan.
  • A discount badge makes the saving obvious without any math.
  • Showing the saving shifts users toward the yearly plan, which is worth more per user.

Caveats: Sample size, duration and confidence were not shared, and the post was written by Superwall, which sells the paywall testing tool used.

Who ran it

Stardust ran this test. Source: Superwall blog. The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original source →

How to run this test on your app

Hypothesis
If we show a discount percentage and a weekly-equivalent price on the yearly plan, then more users will pick yearly because the saving over the weekly plan is clear.
Primary metric
Proceeds per user
Guardrails
  • Paywall conversion rate
  • Yearly plan share
  • Refund rate
Who should test it
Apps that sell both a short plan and a yearly plan with a real saving between them. It does little if you only sell one plan.

Questions

Should I show the yearly price as a weekly or monthly equivalent?

Match the shortest plan you sell. Stardust sold a weekly plan, so a weekly equivalent made the comparison direct.

Can a discount badge hurt?

It can if the saving looks fake or confusing.

Here the prices were real and unchanged, and the badge lifted both conversion and proceeds per user.

Similar tests