Social videos on a steak product page: +6.4% RPV, not significant

Flat / inconclusiveProduct page

Adding social videos to the Air-Dried Steak product page did not produce a clear result: revenue per visitor rose 6.4% and conversion rate fell 4.4%, and neither change was statistically significant.

Novel, the video app, ran this test with Lineage Provisions as a check on a strong win for the same idea on its meat sticks page.

It was published as a Shoplift success story.

+6.4% RPV, not significant
  • Revenue per visitor: +6.4%, not statistically significant.
  • Conversion rate: -4.4%, not statistically significant, so fewer buyers is possible but not proven.
  • Average order value: +11.3% was reported, with no significance stated.
  • We treat the test as inconclusive. The same videos on the Classic Meat Sticks page lifted revenue per visitor by 41.4%.

The change

Control (A)
header
title
price
variant picker
Add to cart
description
reviews
Variant (B)
header
title
price
variant picker
Add to cart
description
Customer story video carouselNEW
reviews

The variant adds a carousel of customer story videos to the steak page.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

The standard Air-Dried Steak product page, with no video on it.

Variant

The same page with the brand's social video blocks added, including a customer story video carousel.

Why it likely came out this way

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • The videos may not have addressed what steak shoppers worry about, such as texture or how to eat it.
  • A different product can attract buyers with different questions, so the same clips land differently.
  • One week of traffic on a single product page may not have been enough to detect a small effect.

Caveats: The test ran for one week and neither main metric reached significance. It is a partner-app marketing story.

Who ran it

Novel ran this test for Lineage Provisions and published the results (Shoplift success story). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original case study on Novel →

How to run this test on your store

Hypothesis
If we add product-specific customer videos to this product page, then revenue per visitor will rise because the videos answer the questions shoppers have about this exact product.
Primary metric
Revenue per visitor
Guardrails
  • Conversion rate
  • Add-to-cart rate
Who should test it
Brands that saw video work on one product and want to roll it out. Test each product on its own; it probably won't help where you lack videos made for that product.

Questions

Will a video win on one product page work on others?

Not always. In this case the same approach that lifted revenue per visitor 41.4% on one product gave no clear result on another.

What should I do with an inconclusive product page test?

Treat it as no proven effect. Check whether the content fits that product, then retest with better-matched videos or more traffic.

Similar tests