Keyword-matched PPC landing pages: +9.18% conversion rate

WinnerSeveral changes tested togetherLanding page

Conversion rate on one landing page rose 9.18% in two months after KlientBoost built separate landing pages that use dynamic keyword insertion.

KlientBoost did this work for Bento for Business, an expense card company, and published it as a PDF case study.

The pages launched with new search campaigns, call tracking and remarketing, so the lift reflects the whole package.

+9.18% conversion rate
  • Conversion rate: up 9.18% on one specific landing page, not across the account.
  • Application approval rate: up 6.5% month over month, a sign of better-fit applicants.
  • Cost per conversion: down 40%, as reported by the agency.
  • No split-test data was shared, so the share due to the pages is unknown.

The change

Control (A)
header
Generic headlineREPLACED
benefits
Apply now
testimonials
Variant (B)
header
Headline with search keywordNEW
benefits
Apply now
testimonials

The headline changes to match the keyword the visitor searched.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

Paid visitors landed on Bento's earlier pages, before the agency started. The case study does not say how those pages looked.

Variant

KlientBoost built individual landing pages that swap in text matching the visitor's search keyword. The pages went live with granular Google and Bing campaigns, keyword-level call tracking and remarketing on Facebook and Google.

Why it likely won

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • When the headline repeats what someone searched for, they can see right away that they are in the right place.
  • Keyword-level tracking let the team move budget to terms that brought approved applicants, which helps approval rate more than any page change.
  • Granular campaigns usually mean each ad points to a closer-matching page.

Caveats: KlientBoost reported this as a before-and-after result of a full paid-media engagement, not a clean split test of one page. Ads, keywords, targeting and landing pages changed together, and no sample size, duration or significance was shared. The 9.18% figure covers a single landing page over about two months.

Who ran it

KlientBoost ran this test for business debit card / expense card fintech and published the results (KlientBoost case study (PDF)). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original case study on KlientBoost →

How to run this test on your site

Hypothesis
If we insert the visitor's search keyword into the landing page headline, then more paid visitors will apply because the page matches what they were looking for.
Primary metric
Application starts per paid visitor
Guardrails
  • Application approval rate
  • Cost per approved applicant
  • Bounce rate
Who should test it
Fintech and other lead-gen businesses that buy many distinct search keywords. It matters less if you only bid on a handful of near-identical terms.

Questions

What is dynamic keyword insertion on a landing page?

The page reads the keyword from the ad click and drops it into the headline or copy.

Each visitor sees wording close to their own search.

Is a 9.18% conversion rate lift meaningful?

It can be, but here it comes from one page, with no sample size or significance shared.

Treat it as a direction to test, not a benchmark.

Should I track approval rate as well as sign-ups?

Yes, for any offer with an approval step.

More applications mean little if fewer of them qualify.

Similar tests