Long, agent-focused Medicare landing page: +638% leads
Commentary byLiftArchiveOur analysis, not theirsA longer Medicare landing page that introduced the phone agents as trusted advisors drove 638% more leads than the shorter version.
MECLABS Institute ran the test with HealthSpire, an Aetna subsidiary, and it was published as a MarketingSherpa case study.
Many copy and layout changes shipped together on the long page, so the lift can't be credited to page length alone.
- The long page produced 638% more leads, meaning calls and call requests to the call center.
- The source counts valid leads only, so the gain is not just junk inquiries.
- MarketingSherpa says the long page also led on conversions further down the funnel, but gives no figure for that.
- Sample size, test length and confidence level are not shared.
The change
Short product list versus a long page that sells the value of talking to an agent
Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.
Control
A short, simple page listed HealthSpire's Medicare products without much detail. Visitors could call, book a call or start a chat.
Variant
A much longer page added value copy about HealthSpire and each product, and presented the TeleAgents as trusted advisors. It included agent photos, tips from agents and a Q&A with an agent. A second, shorter treatment was also tested.
Why it likely won
Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.
- Most people don't want a sales call. The long page sold the value of the call itself before asking for it.
- Faces, tips and a Q&A let visitors get to know the agents first, which likely made calling feel less risky.
- Medicare plans are complex. For a big decision, more useful detail can lower anxiety more than it adds effort.
- Many visitors were older and less used to buying online, so a human, phone-first approach may have fit them well.
Caveats: The long page changed many things at once: length, value copy, agent imagery, tips and a Q&A. The article first discussed interim numbers, and it is not fully clear whether the final 638% compares the long page with the original or with the short treatment.
Who ran it
MECLABS Institute ran this test and published the results (MarketingSherpa case study). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.
Read the original case study on MECLABS Institute →
How to run this test on your site
- Hypothesis
- If we add copy, photos and a Q&A that show our phone advisors as helpful experts, then more visitors will call us because they will see value in the conversation before they pick up the phone.
- Primary metric
- Qualified calls and call requests per visitor
- Guardrails
- Lead quality or sales conversion from calls
- Call center capacity and wait times
- Bounce rate on the landing page
- Who should test it
- Lead-gen businesses whose main conversion is a phone call or consult, especially in complex or high-stakes categories like insurance, health or finance. It is less likely to help for simple, low-cost offers where visitors already know what they want.
Questions
Do long landing pages convert better than short ones?
Sometimes. In this test the long page won by a wide margin, but the extra length came with stronger value copy and agent content. Length alone is rarely the reason.
How do I get more people to call my business from a landing page?
Show what the call is worth before you ask for it.
Introducing the people they will speak to and what they will get from the call can lower the barrier.
When should a landing page be short?
When the offer is simple and visitors already know what they want.
HealthSpire kept a short version in the test for people who had done their research.
Similar tests
KlientBoostKlientBoost
Seer Interactive