Inline 'More details' box on a card application: +15.5% applications

WinnerLead form

A 'More details' link that opened an inline box of credit card benefits lifted Tinkoff Bank's submitted applications by 15.5%.

A second version, where the same link went to a separate page, did worse than the original.

Tinkoff Bank's own analytics team ran the test on over 60,000 visitors across 13 days, and it was published as a VWO case study.

+15.5% applications
  • Inline box variant: conversion rate up 15.5%, and it beat control throughout the test.
  • Separate-page variant: converted worse than control (exact figure not shared).
  • Conversions were submitted credit card applications.
  • Over 60,000 visitors across 13 days.

The change

Control (A)
header
Credit card offer
Fill out form
Multistep application
Variant (B)
header
Credit card offer
Fill out form
More details linkNEW
Expanded benefits boxNEW
Multistep application

A 'More details' link opens an inline benefits box below the CTA.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

A credit card application page with a 'Fill out form' button above the fold and a multistep form.

Variant

A 'More details' link under the button that expanded a box right on the page, listing benefits such as free card delivery, free top-ups and cashback. A second variant sent the link to a separate page instead.

Why it likely won

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • The inline box gave key reasons to apply without taking visitors off the form.
  • Benefits like free delivery were on the original page but easy to miss; the box made them visible.
  • Sending people to another page likely pulled some away from the form for good.

Caveats: The test ran for 13 days on over 60,000 visitors. Confidence levels for this test were not shared, and the page is from a bank, not a software product.

Who ran it

Tinkoff Bank ran this test and published the results (VWO case study). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original case study on Tinkoff Bank →

How to run this test on your site

Hypothesis
If we let visitors expand key product benefits inline next to the application button, then more will submit the form because they get reassurance without leaving the page.
Primary metric
Submitted application rate
Guardrails
  • Application approval rate
  • Bounce rate
  • Clicks away from the form page
Who should test it
Lead-gen and financial services businesses with a long application form where people want reassurance before starting. Avoid sending that information to a separate page, which lost here.

Questions

Should product details open inline or on a new page?

In this test, inline won and a separate page lost to the original.

Keeping visitors on the form page avoids losing them mid-decision.

What should an inline details box include?

The few benefits that most affect the decision, such as fees, delivery and rewards, shown briefly with text and simple graphics.

Similar tests