Naming the nearest host site in email: +87 event registrations
Commentary byLiftArchiveOur analysis, not theirsAn email that named each past attendee's closest host site brought in 87 more event registrations than the generic version.
The Global Leadership Summit ran this test, and it was published as a MarketingSherpa case study.
The location detail and the call to action changed together.
- The localized email produced 87 more registrations than the control.
- The source gives only this count. It shares no rates, list size or confidence level, so we can't size the lift in percentage terms.
- Two things changed at once, the local site name and the button wording, so neither can take sole credit.
Control
Past attendees got general event messaging with the call to action 'Register now for a location near you.'
Variant
Using each person's past registration address, the email named the host site closest to them, with its city and state. The call to action became 'Reserve your seat here now.'
Why it likely won
Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.
- Naming a real nearby site turns 'somewhere near you' into a specific plan, which is easier to act on.
- It saves the reader a step: they don't need to look up where the event is shown locally.
- 'Reserve your seat' sounds like holding a place rather than starting a task, which may feel lighter to click.
Caveats: The result is an absolute count, with no rate, sample size or significance shared. The geo detail and the call to action changed together, and the conversion is a paid event registration rather than a free lead.
Who ran it
The Global Leadership Summit ran this test and published the results (MarketingSherpa case study). The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.
Read the original case study on The Global Leadership Summit →
How to run this test on your site
- Hypothesis
- If we name each contact's nearest location in our email, then more of them will register because the offer will feel specific and close to home.
- Primary metric
- Registrations per email sent
- Guardrails
- Unsubscribe rate
- Click-to-registration rate
- Share of emails with a missing or wrong location
- Who should test it
- Event, franchise and multi-location businesses with reliable address data for their list. Skip it if your location data is old or patchy, since a wrong site name can backfire.
Questions
Does location personalization work in email?
In this test, naming the closest host site drew 87 more registrations than a generic message.
It works best when your address data is accurate.
Where does location data for email come from?
Here it came from past registration addresses. Billing addresses, store choices or stated preferences are other common sources.
Should I change the call to action at the same time?
If you want to learn which change mattered, test them separately.
This test changed both, so the gain can't be split between them.
Similar tests
MarketingExperiments