Weekly plan instead of monthly on the paywall: +16% paying customers

WinnerPaywall

Offering a weekly subscription instead of a monthly one brought 16% more paying customers.

Pixelcut, an AI photo editing app, ran this A/B test on its paywall, and the result was published as a RevenueCat customer story.

+16% paying customers
  • Paying customers rose 16% with the weekly offer.
  • Pixelcut also looked at LTV per variant and judged weekly the better option, but LTV figures were not shared.
  • Prices, sample size, test length and confidence level were not shared.

The change

Control (A)
close
Before and after edit
title
benefits
Monthly planREPLACED
Price per monthREPLACED
Shop now
Variant (B)
close
Before and after edit
title
benefits
Weekly planNEW
Price per weekNEW
Shop now

The monthly plan is swapped for a weekly plan.

Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.

Control

The paywall offered a monthly subscription.

Variant

The paywall offered a weekly subscription instead of the monthly one.

Why it likely won

Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.

  • A weekly price looks small, so the first payment feels like a lower commitment.
  • Photo editing is often needed for one task, and a short plan fits that use.
  • More paying users only help if they renew; Pixelcut's LTV view suggests they did enough, but no numbers were given.

Caveats: Prices, sample size and duration were not shared. The result was published by RevenueCat, which sells the experiments tool Pixelcut used, so it may lean positive. Pixelcut rolled the winner out to new users only.

Who ran it

Pixelcut ran this test. Source: RevenueCat customer story. The numbers are theirs; the summary and commentary on this page are ours.

Read the original source →

How to run this test on your app

Hypothesis
If we replace the monthly plan with a weekly plan, then more users will pay because the entry price feels smaller and matches short bursts of use.
Primary metric
Paying customers per paywall view
Guardrails
  • Realized LTV per user at 3 and 6 months
  • Refund rate
  • Weekly-plan churn after the first few renewals
Who should test it
Utility and creator apps with bursty, task-based use. Apps that rely on long-term habits or sell mostly yearly plans may see weekly plans churn too fast.

Questions

Do weekly plans hurt LTV?

They can if users cancel after a week or two.

Pixelcut checked LTV per variant before rolling out weekly, but did not share the numbers.

Should I show weekly and monthly side by side instead?

That is a different test. Pixelcut compared one offer against the other, not a choice between both.

Similar tests