Layout, Font and Redesign A/B Tests: What 33 Results Show

All 33 measured layout and redesign tests are recorded as wins. The most useful pattern for a small change: bigger fonts won all 3 times they were tested, including Dave Diederen's fonts made 5% bigger at +5.41% conversion rate and +6.91% revenue per visitor.

The biggest numbers came from full redesigns, such as Josh Thompson's new landing page design at +137.26% conversion rate. Those change many things at once, so you cannot tell which part did the work.

Two results hide a loss, which are named below. 17 of the 33 tests were on product pages.

measured results
0–0won vs lost or flat
ideas to test

What counts as layout and design

This collection covers font size, spacing and padding, section order, above-the-fold redesigns, full page rebuilds and theme changes. Many tests also changed copy, images or offers, so read each one for what else moved.

The win/loss record

33 wins and no recorded losses. That record says as much about what gets published as about layout. Two wins also contain a loss: Dave Diederen's checkout test notes that a full checkout redesign lost (-1.18% CVR), and Dave's bundle selector redesign cut conversion rate by 5.22% while raising revenue per visitor 9.45%.

Where layout was tested

  • Product page: 17
  • Homepage: 6
  • Site-wide: 3
  • Landing page: 3
  • Cart: 2
  • Checkout: 1
  • Navigation: 1

Single changes that won

Bigger fonts

All three font tests are Dave Diederen's, two for older audiences:

Tighter spacing and section order

Dave's more compact bundle buy box gained +10.74% CVR and an estimated +$168,850/month. Dave's most-clicked category moved to the first homepage tab gained +14.17% CVR, and Peter Christensen's homepage sections reordered using scroll maps gained +12.64% CVR.

Biggest wins: full redesigns

Dave's hero test is useful because it separates copy from layout: the full redesign beat the copy-only version by a wide margin.

Design patterns that won: above the fold

Oliver Kenyon ran four above-the-fold product page tests that all won: an outcome headline with context visuals and trust signals (+25% CVR), social proof and Add to Cart in the first mobile view (+$47,927/month), a new image slider with clearer CTAs (+$36,772/month) and a smaller above-the-fold redesign (+$6,710/month). The common thread is getting the benefit, proof and buy button into view without scrolling.

Tests that lost or were flat

No test here is recorded as a loss. The two buried losses above, a full checkout redesign at -1.18% CVR and a conversion rate drop of 5.22% on a bundle selector, are the cautions to take: redesigns can lose, and a win on revenue can hide a drop in orders.

How to change layout on Shopify

Font size and spacing are usually theme settings or a few lines of CSS. Section order is set in the theme editor. Full redesigns need a duplicate theme or template so you can split traffic.

How to test it on your store

Hypothesis: a 5% larger font will raise revenue per visitor because copy is easier to read, especially for older buyers. Start with single changes like this, then test a full redesign against the original. Track conversion rate and AOV separately, and size each test with the sample size calculator.

Questions

Does increasing font size improve conversion rate?

In all three tests here, yes. Dave Diederen made fonts 5% bigger for +5.41% conversion rate, and +4px on a product page for an older audience gave +4.17% revenue per visitor.

Is a full page redesign worth A/B testing?

The largest gains here came from redesigns, like Josh Thompson's +137.26% conversion rate. But Dave Diederen's full checkout redesign lost (-1.18% CVR), so always test it against the original.

Did any layout tests lose?

None of the 33 is recorded as a loss, but two include one: a full checkout redesign at -1.18% CVR, and a bundle selector redesign that cut conversion rate 5.22% while raising revenue per visitor 9.45%.