Advertorial landing pages for paid traffic: 35% lower CPA
Test run byPeter ChristensenScaling CRO
Commentary byLiftArchiveOur analysis, not theirsSending paid traffic to new advertorial-style landing pages cut cost per acquisition (CPA) by 35% at the same weekly ad spend. Peter Christensen ran this launch with a collaborator for a brand they both support. It is a week-over-week comparison, not a split test.
- CPA down 35% week over week, with ad spend held the same. Each customer cost about a third less to acquire.
- Compared with the week before that, spend was up 25% and CPA was down 39%. Spend went up and cost per customer still fell.
- No conversion rate, order value or revenue figures were shared.
The change
Paid traffic lands on an article-style page instead of a standard product page; exact layouts were not shared.
Simplified mockup drawn by LiftArchive from the shared screenshots.
Control
Paid traffic went to the brand's previous landing pages. The post does not show what those pages looked like.
Variant
Paid traffic went to new landing pages written in an advertorial style, where the page reads like an article before it pitches the product. The page design itself was not shared.
Why it likely won
Our reading of the result, not the practitioner's claim.
- an article-style page warms up cold ad traffic by explaining the problem before asking for the sale.
- the page may match the tone of the ad better than a standard product page, so fewer clicks bounce.
- longer pages give room to handle objections that a short product page skips.
Caveats: This is a before/after comparison across weeks, not a split test, so ad creative, seasonality or audience changes could explain part of the drop. Only one week of data was shown, for a single brand.
Who ran it
Peter Christensen (@peterac_) shared this test on X. The numbers and screenshots are theirs.
View the original post on X
How to run this test on your store
- Hypothesis
- If we send paid traffic to an advertorial-style landing page instead of a product page, then CPA will fall because cold visitors get the story and proof before the pitch.
- Primary metric
- Cost per acquisition (CPA)
- Guardrails
- Average order value
- Refund rate
- Click-through rate from page to product
- Who should test it
- Brands spending on cold social or native ads for products that need explaining. It is less likely to help branded search traffic or shoppers who already know what they want.
Questions
What is an advertorial landing page?
It is a page that reads like an article or story and then leads into the product. Here it replaced the brand's earlier landing pages for paid traffic.
Do advertorial pages lower ad costs?
In this case CPA fell 35% at the same weekly spend. It was a week-over-week comparison, so treat it as a strong signal rather than proof.
How should I test an advertorial against my product page?
Split the same ad traffic between both pages at the same time and compare CPA and order value. That removes the week-to-week noise this result carries.
Similar tests
@oliverkenyon@oliverkenyon@oliverkenyon@oliverkenyon
@DaveDiederen@DaveDiederen